-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good so far, I'll probably make some changes once merged however. I like the event-driven changes, I think that suits the purpose better.
I need to change the new()
method on the Song
struct to use String::new()
instead of "".to_string()
. I don't know why I did that. I guess that was when I was a bit new to Rust!
As we discussed on IRC, there's some changes that need to be made upstream, so I won't merge this PR just yet, given that it fails on CI, and that we're waiting on upstream (mpris-rs
) to review your issue you made.
Otherwise, good job! 👍
Wrt. to that, there's a |
@rubdos I can make the change on master, I just don't want to mess up your PR. Would you mind if I made a few changes on master? |
What's the change you have in mind? Getting rid of |
I just (finally) incorporated a PoC for Mange/mpris-rs#36 .
(Song doesn't get filled yet) |
@rubdos PR looks good. Don't worry about filing the song. I'll do the DB stuff :-) There is a conflict with Cargo.{lock,toml}, which I'd like to see resolved in the PR before I merge. Thank you for your contribution to |
Would you merge it as-is for the rest? Because it's just a PoC at this point :'-) |
I'll see if I can merge it, but I'll be merging into a development branch for the MPRIS branch, and not into I would prefer that more testing is done on the PR itself before merging into the main codebase. |
I have merged your PR into the codebase as of 18bc111, which seems to be working correctly. As I have merged the PR, it will now be closed. Please do open another PR for future improvements. Many thanks for your contribution! |
PR for early feedback.
todo: