Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

explicitly set colors to 256 #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2014
Merged

explicitly set colors to 256 #10

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2014

Conversation

arlimus
Copy link
Contributor

@arlimus arlimus commented May 26, 2014

While testing, this color scheme first didn't work for me (linux, xfce4-terminal and gnome-terminal; worked on xterm). To be sure, explicitly call 256 colors for this scheme.

While testing this color scheme didn't work for me (linux, xfce4-terminal and gnome-terminal; worked on xterm). To be sure, explicitly add 256 colors to the scheme.
@ku1ik
Copy link
Owner

ku1ik commented May 26, 2014

I believe t_Co should not be set by color schemes. It should rather be respected by them. If you'll run vim in 16-colors only terminal with this scheme it wouldn't display 256 colors anyway.

@arlimus
Copy link
Contributor Author

arlimus commented May 30, 2014

@sickill I guess it's more from the point that: if sb. uses this theme they'll want 256 color-configuration anyway. For some systems that don't solve this automatically and users that don't know about this option, the theme will initially appear to not work. If you know about this option you'll be fine, but for others it will look problematic.

Are there downsides to setting it here? In case you don't want it, i'll close this MR, please let me know ;)

ku1ik added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2014
explicitly set colors to 256
@ku1ik ku1ik merged commit 168adea into ku1ik:master Jun 10, 2014
@ku1ik
Copy link
Owner

ku1ik commented Jun 10, 2014

Ok, you convinced me ;). Merging. Thx!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants