This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 3, 2024. It is now read-only.
Added core cycle count, core cycles/iter, and CoreMarks/MHz #634
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…tation of CoreMarks/MHz
BrianGraysonSiV
requested review from
e-puerto,
sifive-eblot and
paul-walmsley-sifive
as code owners
|
@BrianGraysonSiV
|
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This patch does not change any of the existing time-reporting, but adds in the core cycle counts, and a computation of CoreMarks/MHz. This makes it easier for customers who do not alter the environment to set their RTC tick frequency #define properly.
I have tested this on a few cores, but of course additional testing would be great.