Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop conditional when verifying entry checkpoint #1917

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

haydentherapper
Copy link
Contributor

@haydentherapper haydentherapper commented Dec 19, 2023

The log has been returning checkpoints for over a year now. Additionally, there should be no persisted bundles where the inclusion proof does not include a checkpoint, because it was marked as a required field from its inception.

Summary

Release Note

VerifyLogEntry now requires a checkpoint to verify an inclusion proof for an entry.

Documentation

The log has been returning checkpoints for over a year now.
Additionally, there should be no persisted bundles where the inclusion
proof does not include a checkpoint, because it was marked as a required
field from its inception.

Signed-off-by: Hayden Blauzvern <hblauzvern@google.com>
@haydentherapper haydentherapper enabled auto-merge (squash) December 19, 2023 00:42
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (9b0805b) 66.40% compared to head (71ef15f) 66.37%.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/verify/verify.go 0.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1917      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.40%   66.37%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines        9194     9193       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         6105     6102       -3     
- Misses       2345     2347       +2     
  Partials      744      744              
Flag Coverage Δ
e2etests 47.61% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 47.20% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@haydentherapper haydentherapper merged commit fe04993 into sigstore:main Dec 19, 2023
14 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v1.2.2 milestone Dec 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants