Clean up SearchQuery API (less misleading names, fluent interface) #64
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SearchQuery->search()
is highly misleading - it implies that a search is executed,while in fact it only adds a search term to an internal property.
This gets even more confusing since the actual method executing passing
on the search request to the backend is also called
SearchIndex->search()
.And many implementations also create a
Page_Controller->search()
one layer further up.Renamed other methods along the same lines, for example
start()
is a confusingname for adding a start value for pagination, and
inClass()
implies a booleanreturn while in fact its adding a filter.
Also added getters to get naming a bit more consistent (e.g.
filter()
sets$require
).Set the deprecation notices to 2.0, so a future release.