Default relationship of add(), get(), ...

[pablo-de-andres]

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Aug 22, 2019, 14:12

When we add() without specifying a relationship, we currently use cuds.classes.HasPart as a default.
When we get() without specifying a relationship, we currently return all children (i. e. connected with ActiveRelationship or subclass).

Therefore, we have different default relationships (HasPart vs. ActiveRelationship).
Should we change that?

[pablo-de-andres]

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on Sep 13, 2019, 11:21

I think the default for add() has to stay, to offer some sort of backward compatibility and a behaviour for cases where the relationships might not be so relevant.

And while the behaviours are indeed different, I believe we also need a filtering option for all the active relationships, since they are most probably what the user will define (while the program maintains the inverses).

So we could make it consistent, but we should make sure there is a way to get all the entities connected through active relationships (possibly entity.get(rel=CUBA.ACTIVE_RELATIONSHIP))

By Pablo de Andres on 2019-09-13T09:21:03 (imported from GitLab project)

[pablo-de-andres]

In GitLab by @yoavnash on Oct 25, 2019, 13:43

removed milestone

[pablo-de-andres]

In GitLab by @urbanmatthias on May 7, 2020, 11:21

closed