-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request: Qwik #7922
Comments
Hello, wondering if we could help out with this pull request to help you get this merged. Anything we could do to help you? |
As the website isn't popular enough to register a ranking on Similarweb and we're in the process of reworking our metrics of popularity to put much less import on GitHib stars, is there another metric we can use to assess the popularity of this one? |
Thanks for the data, @mhevery. That it's on an upward trend and is now on a par with SolidJS are certainly points in favour of its inclusion. On the other hand, it's only just reached that par and only because SolidJS is on a downward trend, so I think we should monitor it a little further to see if it continues its upward growth. Could you share the link for the comparison above, please? |
At this point, I think it would be awesome if we could re-consider Qwik's inclusion here. It's now well established, widely used and still growing. I'd be happy to submit a PR, if you would be okay with that @PeterShaggyNoble? EDIT: I've submitted PR in #10378 JustificationQwik made it into the 2023 StackOverflow Developer survey (as the 5th most desired frontend framework) Qwik has also been added to the most used frontend frameworks list, number 8 on the JS Rising Stars Qwik hit V1.0 stable almost a year ago, and since then has just been rising steadily (according to GitHub Stars (yes, I know not the best metric)). It's used by many projects, as illustrated by it's NPM downloads are not insignificant, and again is steadily rising Despite being a software project, and so GitHub being their main homepage, their website's SimilarWeb page still recieves fairly decent traffic (250k quarterly visits). But this is still unranked (ranked 55,231 worldwide for root domain (builder.io). Of course, I understand that frontend frramewoks come and go pretty regularly, and it's not feasible to add them all, especially the smaller ones. But I think that at this point Qwik has been around for over a year, has considerable usage, and is still steadily rising, so ought to be reconsidered for inclusion. Edit: On second thought, I see that although there's many smaller sites than Qwik here, there's also no inclusion of more / equally popular frontend frameworks, like HTMX, Million.js, Nue, Lit, etc. Maybe this repo isn't the right place for icons relating to developer tools like these? |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
* Adds Qwik icon (##7922) * Update _data/simple-icons.json * Remove trailing newline qwik.svg * Fix ordering * Updates with @EatChangmyeong's Qwik icon * Remove trailing newline from Qwik icon * Update icon * Update source * Remove newline * Redo icon --------- Co-authored-by: uncenter <47499684+uncenter@users.noreply.github.com>
* Adds Qwik icon (#simple-icons#7922) * Update _data/simple-icons.json * Remove trailing newline qwik.svg * Fix ordering * Updates with @EatChangmyeong's Qwik icon * Remove trailing newline from Qwik icon * Update icon * Update source * Remove newline * Redo icon --------- Co-authored-by: uncenter <47499684+uncenter@users.noreply.github.com>
Brand Name
Qwik
Website
https://qwik.builder.io/
Popularity Metric
https://www.similarweb.com/website/qwik.builder.io/#ranking
Official Resources for Icon and Color
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BuilderIO/qwik/main/.github/assets/qwik-logo.svg
Additional Comments
Probably @mhevery can add more info
Contributing
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: