We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question - in the bits looping over the arrays I notice item 1 is set and all the loops go to len + 1.
Is this a side effect of fortran arrays starting at 1 ?
On a quick look, it looks like the zeroth elements are only accessed when the matrices are cleared.
http://developeronline.blogspot.co.uk/2008/04/why-array-index-should-start-from-0.html
This is probably just me misunderstanding the maths though :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good catch! I think you're right, I'll work on fixing this today.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Cool. I found this looking in the python one after your article. If it's right it should make the matrix loop code simpler.
Superseded by #117
No branches or pull requests
Question - in the bits looping over the arrays I notice item 1 is set and all the loops go to len + 1.
Is this a side effect of fortran arrays starting at 1 ?
On a quick look, it looks like the zeroth elements are only accessed when the matrices are cleared.
http://developeronline.blogspot.co.uk/2008/04/why-array-index-should-start-from-0.html
This is probably just me misunderstanding the maths though :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: