-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
travis-ci updates upon release of node.js 12 #10
Comments
I don't. I usually just update
Yup. If you bother, feel free.
👍 Probably smart to do a test PR to ensure we agree on everything. |
Test PR at sindresorhus/make-dir#16. |
Unless you have an objection my plan is to pump out a bunch of essentially identical PR's but to let travis-ci handle running the tests. I can notify you here when all the PR's I'm posting for the day have all passed CI (I'll include a search URL to list all the PR's). I assume you wouldn't merge anything that hasn't gotten the green checkmark from CI anyways? |
I ended up scripting this part of the way so I did run tests against node.js 12 on my local Fedora machine ( The only failure I ran into was with All PR's have passed travis-ci, the search URL for these PR's is: |
Great. Thanks for doing this. 👍 |
Not a problem, I use enough of your modules. Next round of PR's have been posted and have now passed on travis-ci. All of these are for The only module which failed local testing is reported at sindresorhus/resolve-from#13 (the module isn't broken, just an expanded error message). |
I'm gonna close this, but feel free to continue discussing here or submit more PRs. |
That's fine, the remaining packages on my list cannot be changed in bulk. One thing I noticed 13 of the modules in my list have engines.node
|
Ok. I'll deprecate this one.
I'm aware of these, but I don't want to unnecessarily bother people. I'll deprecate them eventually, but no rush. |
Do you have a method for performing mass update of
.travis.yml
in your node.js packages to include testing against node.js 12 when it is released? If not do you want a bunch of PR's that do nothing else but add 12 to the testing? Obviously my target would be packages that I directly/indirectly use so probably 50-100 packages, but I figure this should still be helpful? If I did this I would use the commit messageAdd Node.js 12 to testing
. Any additional required changes would be clearly noted, for example if a test had to be fixed to work on node.js 12.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: