Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

repo migration #30

Closed
facastagnini opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 10 comments
Closed

repo migration #30

facastagnini opened this issue Nov 9, 2016 · 10 comments

Comments

@facastagnini
Copy link

facastagnini commented Nov 9, 2016

@mivok is no longer maintaining this repo.
There is a pile of PRs that never got merged, and he doesnt participate in the discussions.

I propose to move forward and use a fork mentioned here #26

Lets try to get together behind a single fork to get the benefits of the community :)

@bhardin, @choglundsp, @tony-caffe, @wzur , @akhon , @dphilpot, @trumant, @hahnicity, @lyletagawa, @gnarf, @olpia, @stucki, @rudibatt, @dphilpot

You guys submitted PRs that never got merged, please share your thoughts.

@mivok
Copy link
Contributor

mivok commented Nov 9, 2016

Hi,

I would be happy to have a new maintainer take over this project. This was a small role developed for personal use and I no longer use ansible regularly. Let me know if there is anything I can do to facilitate the transfer to a new maintainer (E.g. I can transfer the repository if someone wishes to take over maintainership of the project).

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

@facastagnini and @mivok,

As mentioned in the PR, we would be happy to take over maintenance of the
role. Again, please note the following differences:

  • groups_to_create is now a list of dictionaries. This allows users to more
    easily specify a gid.
  • Fixed with_items: deprecation warnings from Ansible 2+
  • Items in the users list take a new attribute of profile for setting up
    custom shell profiles.

@mivok,

I think transferring ownership of the repo makes sense, but I believe I
will need to rename our existing fork to facilitate the transfer. Once the
transfer is complete, I will probably tag the repo as is before merging the
changes from our fork.

Let me know if this makes sense and I will rename our fork and we can move
forward with the transfer.

@mivok
Copy link
Contributor

mivok commented Nov 9, 2016

Sure, that sounds fine to me.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

I've renamed our fork. Feel free to transfer the repo to @singleplatform-eng whenever.

@mivok
Copy link
Contributor

mivok commented Nov 9, 2016

So when I try to transfer it, I get the following:

singleplatform-eng already has a repository in the mivok/ansible-users network and You don’t have admin rights to singleplatform-eng

I believe these are two separate issues:

  • The existing fork might have to be deleted and not just renamed
  • Admin access in the receiving organization is required to transfer a repository to an organization

Rather than give me admin access to singleplatform-eng, I can transfer the repository directly to you (choglundsp) and you can then transfer it into the organization (presumably you have admin access there). You would still have to address the fact that the fork already exists in the organization though.

Does that work?

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

yeah, that works. thanks.

@facastagnini
Copy link
Author

Hey @mivok thanks for handing over the administration to keep the repo alive, there is a lot of people using this!

@facastagnini facastagnini changed the title WARNING THIS IS AN ABANDONED PROJECT repo migration Nov 9, 2016
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 9, 2016

I've created a v0.1.0 release which is the state of the codebase before the transfer. I will merge in the minor changes from the singleplatform-eng fork and work through the existing PRs and issues before creating another release.

@ghost ghost closed this as completed Nov 9, 2016
@facastagnini
Copy link
Author

@choglundsp let me know if you need help

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 10, 2016

Thanks, I think I've worked through most of it. I imagine there will likely be some problems that come out of this migration, so don't hesitate to open Issues for them.

@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Jun 6, 2017
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants