Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libmath-mpfr-perl FTBFS on ppc*: subnormal_doubles.t fails #2

Closed
gregoa opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

libmath-mpfr-perl FTBFS on ppc*: subnormal_doubles.t fails #2

gregoa opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@gregoa
Copy link

gregoa commented Jan 9, 2019

We have the following bug reported to the Debian package of Math-MPFR
(https://bugs.debian.org/918673):

It doesn't seem to be a bug in the packaging, so you may want to take
a look. Thanks!

------8<-----------8<-----------8<-----------8<-----------8<-----

Source: libmath-mpfr-perl
Version: 4.05-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libmath-mpfr-perl

...
Invalid type 'D' in pack at t/subnormal_doubles.t line 63.
t/subnormal_doubles.t ............ 
1..1
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 1/1 subtests 

Calling all cache freeing functions
Skipping tests 4, 5 and 6 - not relevant to this build
...
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/subnormal_doubles.t          (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
  Non-zero exit status: 255
  Parse errors: Bad plan.  You planned 1 tests but ran 0.
Files=69, Tests=1137, 12 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr  0.08 sys +  2.49 cusr  0.28 csys =  3.14 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 1/69 test programs. 0/1137 subtests failed.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1021: test_dynamic] Error 255


------8<-----------8<-----------8<-----------8<-----------8<-----

Thanks for considering,
gregor herrmann,
Debian Perl Group

@sisyphus
Copy link
Owner

sisyphus commented Jan 10, 2019 via email

@gregoa
Copy link
Author

gregoa commented Jan 10, 2019 via email

@sisyphus
Copy link
Owner

sisyphus commented May 1, 2022

Issue was fixed ... some time ago.

@sisyphus sisyphus closed this as completed May 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants