Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pasting another ref before or after an existing ref should not merge #8309

Closed
3 tasks done
chenshinshi opened this issue May 19, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@chenshinshi
Copy link

chenshinshi commented May 19, 2023

如果在已有锚文本前后复制建立新锚文本会合并为旧的锚文本

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Can the issue be reproduced with the default theme (daylight/midnight)?

  • I was able to reproduce the issue with the default theme

Could the issue be due to extensions?

  • I've ruled out the possibility that the extension is causing the problem.

Describe the problem

如图所示,我的锚文本左上角的自定义图标也可以指明这一点,确实存在合并。可以在默认主题复现。
fmKIFVEHrG

Expected result

希望修复该问题。

Screenshot or screen recording presentation

No response

Version environment

- Version: 2.8.8最新版
- Operating System: win
- Browser (if used):

Log file

无需

More information

No response

@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented May 19, 2023

你好,这个是设计如此,如果两个引用中间没有任何字符(空格也算)分隔的话会自动合并。

@88250 88250 closed this as completed May 19, 2023
@zxhd863943427
Copy link
Contributor

这个设计的目的是什么?

@88250 88250 reopened this May 19, 2023
@88250 88250 added the Bug label May 19, 2023
@88250 88250 added this to the 2.8.9 milestone May 19, 2023
@88250 88250 changed the title 如果在已有锚文本前后复制建立新锚文本会合并为旧的锚文本 Pasting another ref before or after an existing ref should not merge May 19, 2023
@88250
Copy link
Member

88250 commented May 19, 2023

这里确实合并错了,我之前测试的时候是直接粘贴,没有划选文本粘贴,抱歉抱歉。

Vanessa219 added a commit that referenced this issue May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants