Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Found Inconsistencies - Still Active? #52

Open
ioneyed opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 14 comments
Open

Found Inconsistencies - Still Active? #52

ioneyed opened this issue Jan 16, 2017 · 14 comments

Comments

@ioneyed
Copy link

ioneyed commented Jan 16, 2017

I was wondering if this project is still active because I found some inconsistencies with versioning and what your marketing site is using.

  1. your marketing site is using skeleton.css version 1.0.4 yet your npm packages start with 1.0.7
  2. I attempted to recreate your base site for a "bone" that I am working on however the differences in 1.0.10/9 make grid vastly different in your marketing site. (basically eliminates the gutters between the columns).

If this project isn't active, I thank you for all your work and will fork/create my own based on this work.

@rafgugi
Copy link
Contributor

rafgugi commented Jan 16, 2017

how do we know if this project isnt active?

@ioneyed
Copy link
Author

ioneyed commented Jan 16, 2017

No commits in 4 months, their main site is using out dated version of their own framework.. General signs of abandonment or staleness.

@enlore
Copy link
Contributor

enlore commented Jan 16, 2017

A bit stale, yeah. Abandoned, no. We live! And we welcome PRs if you'd like to help tighten things up. I'm afraid I'm guilty of using the framework more or less as it stands (with a few tweaks) and not circling back here to publish updates.

Knowing that people are using it is motivating, though. Let me know if you have any questions pursuant to crafting your Bone and I'll put time in this week to update the site, sync up the versions.

Thanks for pinging.

@GusBeare
Copy link

GusBeare commented Jan 27, 2017

I like what I see and I'd like to use it but I got the css from getskeleton.com and I see this at the top of skeleton.css:

/*

The version in this dist is:

/*! skeleton-framework | 1.1.1 | MIT | 3/7/2016 */

I'm confused about which version I should be using?

@enlore
Copy link
Contributor

enlore commented Jan 27, 2017

The newer version. The version from getskeleton.com is the older, unmaintained version.

@GusBeare
Copy link

ok, thanks

@rafgugi
Copy link
Contributor

rafgugi commented Jan 27, 2017

btw I have an idea to rebuild skeleton using sass (or scss), but I am still new to it and dont know where to start. but I know its good because most frontend library use it

@GusBeare
Copy link

yes, great, good idea. Thanks for keeping this alive. Bootstrap is too big for some of the simpler sites I do.

@mef
Copy link
Contributor

mef commented Feb 14, 2017

I attempted to recreate your base site for a "bone" that I am working on however the differences in 1.0.10/9 make grid vastly different in your marketing site. (basically eliminates the gutters between the columns).

You may want to use dist/index.html (in the repo), which is more up-to-date than the martketing site, and includes newer features of skeleton framework (such as cards).

@mvdkleijn
Copy link

Mayhaps someone should update the marketing site?

@andrewbash
Copy link

Seeing as I've used this framework for just about every project for the past several years I would be happy to update the marketing site... I just can't find where to contribute to it... I don't see a github pages branch, or anywhere in the repo the github page would be pulling from.

Any advice?

@enlore
Copy link
Contributor

enlore commented Nov 15, 2017

Would love to have the help. Let me circle back to this in the next couple days and I’ll get you set up.

@turquoise-turtle
Copy link

The marketing site's repo is at https://github.com/skeleton-framework/skeleton-framework.github.io

@xeruf
Copy link

xeruf commented Sep 18, 2022

@enlore still actively using it?

See also #6

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants