Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider a different installed package name #1

Open
banteg opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

consider a different installed package name #1

banteg opened this issue Sep 14, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@banteg
Copy link

banteg commented Sep 14, 2022

eth conflicts with py-evm

https://github.com/ethereum/py-evm/tree/master/eth

@skellet0r
Copy link
Owner

skellet0r commented Sep 15, 2022

once I've got something package-able I'll plead to the EF gods to transition that package into using the eth namespace, instead of hogging it up. Already did so for this repo here: 710e321.

https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/

Also they don't seem to have 3.10 support (go figure), which is fine since this lib is targetting 3.10+. So I think by happenstance it'd be incompatible to install both.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants