Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JavaReflectAPI is conflicting when assembly skinny-micro and skinny-framework #366

Closed
smdmts opened this issue Nov 22, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #367
Closed

JavaReflectAPI is conflicting when assembly skinny-micro and skinny-framework #366

smdmts opened this issue Nov 22, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #367

Comments

@smdmts
Copy link

smdmts commented Nov 22, 2017

Hi, I'm using sbt-assembly plugin with skinny-framework but the following error has occurred. Because skinny/util/JavaReflectAPI.scala is containing the same path of skinny-micro and skinny-framework.
Please let me know if this problem correspondence in skinny-framework?

Dependency Graph

[info]     | +-org.skinny-framework:skinny-common_2.12:2.5.1 [S]
[info]     |   +-com.typesafe:config:1.3.2
[info]     |   +-joda-time:joda-time:2.9.9
[info]     |   +-org.joda:joda-convert:1.9.2
[info]     |   +-org.scala-lang.modules:scala-parser-combinators_2.12:1.0.6 [S]
[info]     |   +-org.skinny-framework:skinny-micro-common_2.12:1.2.7 [S]
[info]     |     +-org.slf4j:slf4j-api:1.7.21 (evicted by: 1.7.25)
[info]     |     +-org.slf4j:slf4j-api:1.7.25

Error log

[error] /{user_name}/.coursier/cache/v1/https/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/skinny-framework/skinny-common_2.12/2.5.1/skinny-common_2.12-2.5.1.jar:skinny/util/JavaReflectAPI$.class
[error] /{user_name}/.coursier/cache/v1/https/repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/skinny-framework/skinny-micro-common_2.12/1.2.7/skinny-micro-common_2.12-1.2.7.jar:skinny/util/JavaReflectAPI$.class
seratch added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 22, 2017
Bump dependencies and remove duplicated class #366
@smdmts
Copy link
Author

smdmts commented Nov 24, 2017

@seratch Thanks, now it works fine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant