INTYGFV-15269: Upgrade build system, react and dependencies #715
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
packages/webcert/src/feature/certificate/CareUnit/UvCareUnitAddress.test.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
302 redirect is broken when using the welcome screen for now vitejs/vite#9520 |
SopraErik
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This aims to replace CRA and jest with vite, vites and fix dependency issues between common and webcert. This introduces faster builds, tests and turbo for managing packages within the repository.
https://vitejs.dev/
https://vitest.dev/
https://turbo.build/
I have removed storybook temporarily to better focus on getting everything else working. Storybook can be re-introduced easily later, but could cause a lot of noise when trying to deprecate CRA.