-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minimum hardware requirements #36
Comments
Your specs should be sufficient, although more CPU power might improve the level of enrichment. Performance is really sample- and flowcell-dependent, so it's hard to predict how many cores would be ideal. In general more is better, but running with 8 threads on 4 cores should work fairly well. I'd also make sure you have at least 500GB of free disk space for your run. |
Great, thanks!
I did have another question related to this. Is there a reason this won't work for r10 flowcells? Or is it just untested? Are there plans to support them moving forward? |
r10 flowcells have very different signal characteristics than r9.4. The biggest challenge is that r10 pores cover more bases than r9.4, meaning our pore model would probably need longer k-mers, and it would take some work to efficiently handle that. We may work on it someday, but don't have any immediate plans. |
Got it. Thanks for the help! At the very least, I'll go ahead an express interest in supporting r10 pores if it helps convince someone to fund the work! 😄 |
Hi, I noticed in the Uncalled manuscript a rather beefy machine was used for the sequencing. I was curious whether someone could comment on the minimum hardware specs to run this with good performance. For instance, would a computer with the minimum specs for a MinION (ie 16GB RAM, >4 core CPU, ~1TB SSD) be sufficient to run this in real time? If not, what should be modified?
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: