New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOC] write docstring for RNN estimators #4558
Comments
hey, I like to work on this issue and as I am new to the project could you provide the references to solve the issue? |
sure! have a look at other estimators, e.g., If you are wondering about how to contribute, here is the contribution guide: |
Thanks for the instructions @fkiraly |
welcome to sktime, @wasup-yash! |
Yikes, must have missed adding that. @wasup-yash thanks for taking it up, if you have any questions regarding it please let us know. |
@achieveordie yeah for sure, can you please point out where exactly in the path it needs to be updated? |
Take a look at We use Read The Docs and Sphinx to auto-generate the documentation using the docstrings. Also, before you start working on it, please ensure that you've got the development setup right- this will ensure the linting/formatting checks won't fail when you open a PR. Here's the developer's guide to assist you with it. |
hey @achieveordie the parameters are the same in the |
That's correct, both of these estimators have the same parameters and we intend to at least have 3 things, a one-line summary, parameter description and defaults and references at the end. Only parameter descriptions and defaults seem to be missing. |
can you assign this to me so I start working on the PR? |
There you go @wasup-yash, thanks :) |
thanks, @achieveordie , I'll reach out incase of some issue :) |
hey @achieveordie do |
We're already adding the references, aren't we? Line 24 |
yeah but in |
Towards #4558 Added DocStrings for the `[SimpleRNNClassifier]`(https://github.com/sktime/sktime/blob/main/sktime/classification/deep_learning/rnn.py#L20)
The docstrings for estimators
SimpleRNNRegressor
andSimpleRNNClassifier
are practically empty, these should be added.At least a description of parameters and their defaults, that is relatively formulaic (from looking at the
__init__
)Update: #4572 added parameters and defaults; a scientific summary is still missing (e.g., paper or description of the neural network)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: