Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UI: Allow custom images for object types #553

Closed
omeranson opened this issue Nov 1, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

UI: Allow custom images for object types #553

omeranson opened this issue Nov 1, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@omeranson
Copy link
Contributor

When adding new objects with new types, we would like to be able to define their images externally, rather than having to modify the main code. This is especially true for external probes or clients adding objects to the analyser.

@safchain safchain self-assigned this Nov 6, 2017
safchain added a commit to safchain/skydive that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2017
Refactor the graph-layout in order
to allow to add/modify icons via
nodeImgMap javascript map.

Closes: skydive-project#553
safchain added a commit to safchain/skydive that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2017
Refactor the graph-layout in order
to allow to add/modify icons via
nodeImgMap javascript map.

Closes: skydive-project#553
safchain added a commit to safchain/skydive that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2017
Refactor the graph-layout in order
to allow to add/modify icons via
nodeImgMap javascript map.

Closes: skydive-project#553
masco pushed a commit to masco/skydive that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2017
Refactor the graph-layout in order
to allow to add/modify icons via
nodeImgMap javascript map.

Closes: skydive-project#553
safchain added a commit to safchain/skydive that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2017
Refactor the graph-layout in order
to allow to add/modify icons via
nodeImgMap javascript map.

Closes: skydive-project#553
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants