Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop Scala 2.11 support on main branch? #2182

Closed
SethTisue opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2184
Closed

Drop Scala 2.11 support on main branch? #2182

SethTisue opened this issue Mar 12, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #2184
Milestone

Comments

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member

SethTisue commented Mar 12, 2021

I propose we drop 2.11 from the main branch. The more Scala versions, the more of a maintenance burden it is, and we can ill-afford maintenance burdens now that Slick is community-maintained.

If someone still needed some important bugfix on 2.11, they would be free to volunteer to maintain a separate 2.11 branch.

@hvesalai
Copy link
Member

hear hear

@SethTisue SethTisue added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Mar 13, 2021
SethTisue added a commit to SethTisue/slick that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2021
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

PR: #2184

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

SethTisue commented Mar 19, 2021

they would be free to volunteer to maintain a separate 2.11 branch

I noticed yesterday that there already exists a 3.3.x branch where fixes could be merged, at least in theory. Volunteer effort would be needed to backport CI and publishing stuff to that branch.

@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

I've publicized this a bit at https://groups.google.com/g/scalaquery/c/JC8-MOIvoic

@SethTisue SethTisue changed the title Drop Scala 2.11 support on master branch? Drop Scala 2.11 support on main branch? Mar 25, 2021
@SethTisue
Copy link
Member Author

done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants