Added macro expansion for redefined Win32 functions

[smalti]

What was done:

• Resolved issue: Macro expansion for WinApi, proxied when implementing a 64-bit architecture #22
• Renamed private macro definitions with implementation details by adding an underscore at the end of each macro (to distinguish between public macros and implementation-specific macros)
• The code for the macro definitions ON_MODULE_FUNC_CALL and EXPECT_MODULE_FUNC_CALL was unified

[Alex0vSky]

I don't know what else to improve.
I've run out of all the bugs. This is probably good.
Can I do checks in CI from GitHubAction? I understand this a little.

[smalti]

Can I do checks in CI from GitHubAction? I understand this a little.

Yes, it's a good idea, we require CI for writing and executing tests.

[smalti]

I don't know what else to improve. I've run out of all the bugs. This is probably good.

Here are some thoughts on what we can improve:

• We need to consider adding support for CMake
• Think about supporting the Linux platform by patching PLT/GOT (but this is quite a big and not easy task)

[Alex0vSky]

• We need to consider adding support for CMake

not clear... can you be more specific please?

• Think about supporting the Linux platform by patching PLT/GOT (but this is quite a big and not easy task)

Interesting,
have experience in patching executable files of ELF format 😃
Long time ago ... SUSE Linux and Eclipse IDE or KDevelop ... I missed the deadline.