Upkeep Simulator Assertions #296
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EasterTheBunny
force-pushed
the
AUTO-6922/upkeep-simulator-assertions
branch
from
3552168
to
2c09fe2
Compare
EasterTheBunny
force-pushed
the
AUTO-6922/upkeep-simulator-assertions
branch
from
6202e08
to
2339510
Compare
amirylm
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To accomplish basic negative assertions, a new config parameter was added to upkeep generation events. The new parameter
expectedindicates whether or not the generated upkeeps are expected to be performed even if they are eligible. Ifexpectedis set tononeand at least one upkeep is performed, the simulation will return with a non-successful exit status.