-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SDL 0240] WebEngine support for SDL JavaScript #231
Comments
Hello @theresalech We have several questions related to WebEngine implementation for GenericHMI.
|
Let me know if you have any questions, I am happy to help. |
@theresalech The additional scope of work for Generic HMI not required for Ford. We would like to propose asking the Steering Committee to vote on allowing Ford to donate this portion of development at a later time, included with a future contribution. We would like this to be considered due to the urgent need of the WebEngine Support implementation for a prioritized project within Ford Motor Company's 2020 Roadmap. |
Hi @TinaKleczka - Can you please advise when Ford would be able to contribute the Generic HMI implementation of this feature? We would like to include that date in the Steering Committee meeting discussion, as it will help members to understand the impact of the delay. It’s worth noting that the Generic HMI implementation is required for Manticore to support this feature, and it is our understanding that there are SDLC members whose SDL integrations are dependent on the Generic HMI. Therefore, we do not consider a feature implementation complete until it’s been added to all impacted platforms. During the Steering Committee discussion, it will be the Project Maintainer’s recommendation to hold off on releases until all impacted platforms have implemented the WebEngine support feature. |
@theresalech Thank you, our current estimate of hours is 400. I will review a date with the team. At this time please understand the criticality of assuring this is implemented to meet a Ford project requirement. Question: Would another member of the consortium have the bandwidth to complete this requirement and/or the Project Maintainer? |
@TinaKleczka We can pose that question to the Steering Committee to see if other members are able to assist. The Project Maintainer can scope the effort as well, and bring findings to the next Steering Committee meeting. |
@theresalech Thank you. It would be very welcomed and appreciated. |
Proposal markdown file has been updated per the revisions included in accepted Evolution Proposal SDL 0240 Revisions - WebEngine support for SDL JavaScript. These revisions change the |
Closed via #240 |
Proposal: WebEngine support for SDL JavaScript
Review: smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution#767
Steering Committee Decision:
locales
in themanifest.json
file, use standard (RFC 5646), and convert locale strings when necessary.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: