Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update __init__.py #217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 12, 2019
Merged

Update __init__.py #217

merged 1 commit into from Mar 12, 2019

Conversation

zwopi
Copy link
Contributor

@zwopi zwopi commented Mar 11, 2019

current version 1.5.0 does not work together with ebusd v3.3.

  • Missing "\n" in request's to get request accepted and processed by ebusd
  • read/write to be needed by ebusd instead of get/set
  • -c within the requests added to be compliant to the content of the 'ebus_cmd' when using CIRCUIT and NAME [FIELD[.N]] out of the ebusd TCP client commands https://github.com/john30/ebusd/wiki/3.1.-TCP-client-commands#read. E.g. ebus_cmd = 'bai statenumber'

item.yaml would be like this
TTANK_DK:
type: num
ebus_cmd: 'bai StorageTemp temp'
ebus_type: get

I do not know how to handle the rows 111 & 112 -> ebus_cmd == 'cycle' - just adapted accordingly.

works with smarthomeng v1.5.1, ebusd v3.3

current version 1.5.0 does not work together with ebusd v3.3.
* Missing "\n" in request's to get request accepted and processed by ebusd
* read/write to  be needed by ebusd instead of get/set
* -c within the requests added to be compliant to the content of the 'ebus_cmd' when using CIRCUIT and NAME [FIELD[.N]] out of the ebusd TCP client commands https://github.com/john30/ebusd/wiki/3.1.-TCP-client-commands#read. E.g. ebus_cmd = 'bai statenumber'

item.yaml would be like this
    TTANK_DK:
        type: num
        ebus_cmd: 'bai StorageTemp temp'
        ebus_type: get

I do not know how to handle the rows 111 & 112 -> ebus_cmd == 'cycle' - just adapted accordingly.

works with smarthomeng v1.5.1, ebusd v3.3
@msinn msinn merged commit 6673347 into smarthomeNG:develop Mar 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants