Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spiral tree mapping screwed up. #1036

Open
jjewell66 opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Spiral tree mapping screwed up. #1036

jjewell66 opened this issue Dec 20, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@jjewell66
Copy link

Hi, every effect I try on my spiral tree just spirals. Snow doesn’t fall vertically. It spirals. I’ve tried many different settings in setup and rendering styles. Screen preview matches physical leds. Even screen preview doesn’t show falling snow.
Tree is just one string of 95 leds wrapped 8 times around a cone. 9” diameter. 16” tall. Starts bottom right. Counterclockwise spiral when looking from the top. I’ve been thru the FB page, manual, forum. Thank you!

@AzGilrock
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah its nothing to do with spirals. Per Preview should be the render style that would work but it doesn't seem to work for the Snowflake effect even on a normal 12x50 flat ribbon tree with that style.

@DLBeckwith
Copy link

I have the same issue with my spiral tree. If there isn't a fix, is there a workaround?

@jjewell66
Copy link
Author

I’ve been playing with different ideas to model my tree. Mostly centering around drawing out a Mercator style projection using excel. Similar to what was done for the ny led ball.

@jjewell66
Copy link
Author

I did not have trouble mapping my horizontally banded tree using the Mercator method. Maybe I should just ignore the angles and treat the spiral ball like a horizontally banded ball and see what it looks like. Downside: on screen previews don’t look like trees.

@AzGilrock
Copy link
Collaborator

This shows the per preview problem I mentioned. Both trees have the same snowflake effect. Left side is Default render style....right side is Per Preview render style. I had to put a grey effect underneath so you could see it's actually a tree model there.

snowflakes

@keithsw1111
Copy link
Collaborator

The problem ... if there is any ... is that the per preview model ends up quite sparse ... and as such the result is probably what is expected ... unless we can shrink the model back down.

@AzGilrock
Copy link
Collaborator

I think the problem is when you create a group you have the option of a Minimal Grid Per Preview or a total screen Per Preview. When you use Per Preview render style on a regular model I'm not sure what you get but there doesn't seem to be a minimal grid type option.

But the other weird thing I'm seeing is if I do this exact same test on a custom model like my CoroAngel from Boscoyo the result is completely opposite. The Per Preview looks like its working and Default looks sparse and terrible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants