Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix VectorSlice.all and ArraySlice.all #264

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 19, 2022

Conversation

p-ouellette
Copy link
Contributor

@p-ouellette p-ouellette commented Dec 16, 2022

Description

These functions had the same implementation as the exists functions. CharArraySlice.all was correct; the other implementations are updated to match.

This should be applied to the the development version as well.

Related Issue

n/a

Motivation and Context

Bug fix.

How Has This Been Tested?

I built SML/NJ and confirmed that the function works as expected.

These functions had the same implementation as the exists functions.
CharArraySlice.all was correct; the other implementations are updated to
match.
Copy link
Contributor

@JohnReppy JohnReppy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thanks for the fix.

@JohnReppy JohnReppy merged commit ac2bf49 into smlnj:main Dec 19, 2022
@JohnReppy JohnReppy self-assigned this Dec 19, 2022
@JohnReppy JohnReppy added fixed-in-110.99.4 issues that will be fixed in the 110.99.4 version basis-lib problem with Standard ML Basis library labels Dec 19, 2022
JohnReppy added a commit to smlnj/smlnj that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2022
@p-ouellette p-ouellette deleted the fix-slice-all branch December 27, 2022 05:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
basis-lib problem with Standard ML Basis library fixed-in-110.99.4 issues that will be fixed in the 110.99.4 version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants