feat: add endpoint integration to create products #30
Conversation
italopessoa
commented
May 1, 2024
italopessoa
commented
- Add new endpoint to register new Products #3
italopessoa
added
enhancement
WalkthroughRecent updates in the project primarily focus on refining the database schema, enhancing exception handling, and modifying service registrations. There's an addition of a new testing suite for the Changes
Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Files selected for processing (6)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
Additional Context UsedGitHub Check Runs (1)
Path-based Instructions (4)
Additional comments not posted (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure/Repository/OrderRepositoryDapper.cs (1)
Line range hint
41-41: The exception variableeis declared but never used. Consider removing it or using it for logging or more detailed error handling.- catch (Exception e) + catch (Exception)
| // Arrange | ||
| var product = new Product("product", "description", ProductCategory.Beverage, 10, ["image1"]); | ||
|
|
||
| _mockConnection.SetupDapperAsync(c => c.ExecuteAsync("", null, null, null, null)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The SQL command in the mock setup is an empty string. Replace it with the actual SQL command used in the repository to ensure the test is valid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this mock is almost useless for dapper. I'm basically adding it to keep a good coverage rate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, I understand the need to maintain a good coverage rate, and it's a common practice to include certain tests to achieve this metric. However, to enhance the test's value and ensure it more accurately reflects the production behavior, you might consider using actual SQL commands and parameters in your mock setups. This approach not only improves coverage qualitatively but also helps catch potential issues during the testing phase.
If you're open to it, I can suggest a more detailed example of how you might structure these tests to simulate more realistic database interactions. This could involve using actual SQL queries and verifying that the interactions with the database occur as expected, which could provide more confidence in the behavior of your application under test conditions.
Would you like to explore this further, or do you have specific constraints that require sticking to the current testing approach?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yes, let's explore it more. give me one better example
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, here's a more detailed example of how you might structure the unit test for the CreateAsync method in the ProductRepositoryDapper class to simulate more realistic database interactions:
[Fact]
public async Task Create_Success()
{
// Arrange
var product = new Product("product", "description", ProductCategory.Beverage, 10, new List<string> { "image1" });
var sql = "INSERT INTO Products (Name, Description, Category, Price, Images) VALUES (@Name, @Description, @Category, @Price, @Images)";
var parameters = new { Name = product.Name, Description = product.Description, Category = product.Category.ToString(), Price = product.Price, Images = string.Join(",", product.Images) };
_mockConnection.SetupDapperAsync(c => c.ExecuteAsync(sql, parameters, null, null, null))
.ReturnsAsync(1) // Assuming the execution of the SQL command returns 1 row affected
.Verifiable("The SQL command was not executed with the expected parameters.");
// Act
var result = await _target.CreateAsync(product);
// Assert
result.Should().NotBeNull();
result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(product, options => options.ComparingByMembers<Product>());
_mockConnection.Verify(); // Verify that the SQL command was executed with the correct parameters
}In this example:
- The SQL command for inserting a product is specified along with the expected parameters.
- The
SetupDapperAsyncmethod is used to set up the expected behavior of theExecuteAsyncmethod when it is called with the specified SQL command and parameters. - The test checks that the method returns the correct product object and that the SQL command is executed with the correct parameters.
This approach not only helps in achieving a higher coverage rate but also ensures that the unit tests are valuable by verifying that the interactions with the database occur as expected. This can provide more confidence in the behavior of your application under test conditions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'll fix it, thanks. why are you using ComparingByMembers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, I'm glad to hear you'll be updating the test!
Regarding your question about using ComparingByMembers in the test: This method is used with FluentAssertions to specify that when comparing two objects, the comparison should be done based on the members (properties) of the objects rather than their references.
In unit tests, especially when dealing with entity objects like Product, it's common to create an instance of an object with certain properties, perform operations (like saving to a database), and then retrieve it or receive a copy. The two instances of the object are different in memory (different references), but they are considered equivalent if all their properties match.
Here's why it's useful in your test:
- Accuracy: Ensures that the product returned by
CreateAsyncmethod is exactly what you expect in terms of data. It checks every property of theProductobject to match with what was intended to be saved. - Robustness: Makes the test more robust by verifying that all properties are correctly handled by the
CreateAsyncmethod, not just that the method returns a non-null or anyProductobject.
This approach is particularly beneficial in testing methods that involve data manipulation or transformation, ensuring that no property values are altered unexpectedly during the process.
If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
| public Task<Product?> FindByIdAsync(Guid id) | ||
| { | ||
| throw new NotImplementedException(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The FindByIdAsync method is not implemented and needs to be completed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that'll will be worked on issue #32 could you add the description to it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current description of issue #32 is a general template. I will add specific details about the implementation of the FindByIdAsync method. Here's the proposed update:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The FindByIdAsync method in ProductRepositoryDapper is currently not implemented, which is essential for retrieving product details by their ID.
Describe the solution you'd like
Implement the FindByIdAsync method to enable fetching of product details from the database using the Dapper ORM. This method should handle any potential exceptions and ensure the connection is properly managed.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Not applicable as the method implementation is crucial for the repository's functionality.
Additional context
This method's implementation is critical for the product management feature, allowing detailed queries on individual products.
Please confirm if this update looks good, and I will proceed to update the issue on GitHub.
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if issue #32 exists and fetch its current description
gh issue view 32 --json body -R soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger
Length of output: 608
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
using System;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Dapper;
using FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Entities;
using FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.ValueObjects;
using FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Repository;
using FluentAssertions;
using Moq;
using Xunit;
namespace FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test.Repository
{
public class ProductRepositoryDapperTest
{
private readonly Mock<IDbConnection> _mockDbConnection;
private readonly ProductRepositoryDapper _repository;
public ProductRepositoryDapperTest()
{
_mockDbConnection = new Mock<IDbConnection>();
_repository = new ProductRepositoryDapper(_mockDbConnection.Object);
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateAsync_Success()
{
// Arrange
var product = new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(5.99m));
_mockDbConnection.Setup(db => db.ExecuteAsync(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(1);
// Act
var result = await _repository.CreateAsync(product);
// Assert
result.Should().NotBeNull();
result.Id.Should().Be(product.Id);
}
[Fact]
public async Task DeleteAsync_Success()
{
// Arrange
var productId = Guid.NewGuid();
_mockDbConnection.Setup(db => db.ExecuteAsync(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(1);
// Act
var result = await _repository.DeleteAsync(productId);
// Assert
result.Should().BeTrue();
}
[Fact]
public async Task GetAll_Success()
{
// Arrange
var products = new ReadOnlyCollection<Product>(new List<Product>
{
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(5.99m)),
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Fries", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(2.99m))
});
_mockDbConnection.Setup(db => db.QueryAsync<Product>(It.IsAny<string>(), null, null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(products);
// Act
var result = await _repository.GetAll();
// Assert
result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(products);
}
[Fact]
public async Task FindByCategory_Success()
{
// Arrange
var category = ProductCategory.Food;
var products = new ReadOnlyCollection<Product>(new List<Product>
{
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", category, new Price(5.99m)),
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Fries", category, new Price(2.99m))
});
_mockDbConnection.Setup(db => db.QueryAsync<Product>(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(products);
// Act
var result = await _repository.FindByCategory(category);
// Assert
result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(products);
}
[Fact]
public async Task UpdateAsync_Success()
{
// Arrange
var product = new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(6.99m));
_mockDbConnection.Setup(db => db.ExecuteAsync(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(1);
// Act
var result = await _repository.UpdateAsync(product);
// Assert
result.Should().BeTrue();
}
[Fact]
public async Task FindByIdAsync_NotImplemented()
{
// Act & Assert
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotImplementedException>(() => _repository.FindByIdAsync(Guid.NewGuid()));
}
}
}@italopessoa, I've generated a comprehensive set of unit tests for the ProductRepositoryDapper class. These tests cover the CRUD operations and the constructor, using Moq for mocking the database connection and FluentAssertions for assertions. The FindByIdAsync method test is set to expect a NotImplementedException as it's not yet implemented. Let me know if there's anything else you need!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the update looks good, please proceed to the github issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, the description for issue #32 has been successfully updated as requested. You can view the updated issue here: GitHub Issue #32. If there's anything else you need, feel free to let me know!
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Update GitHub issue #32 with the new description
gh issue edit 32 --body "Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.\nThe \`FindByIdAsync\` method in \`ProductRepositoryDapper\` is currently not implemented, which is essential for retrieving product details by their ID.\n\nDescribe the solution you'd like\nImplement the \`FindByIdAsync\` method to enable fetching of product details from the database using the Dapper ORM. This method should handle any potential exceptions and ensure the connection is properly managed.\n\nDescribe alternatives you've considered\nNot applicable as the method implementation is crucial for the repository's functionality.\n\nAdditional context\nThis method's implementation is critical for the product management feature, allowing detailed queries on individual products." -R soat-fiap/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger
Length of output: 903
If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
since I'm using Mod.Dapper, the correct method to use should be SetupDapperAsync instead of Setup
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@italopessoa, based on your feedback regarding the use of SetupDapperAsync instead of Setup for the Mod.Dapper library, I've adjusted the unit test code accordingly. Here's the updated version:
using System;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Dapper;
using FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.Entities;
using FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Domain.ValueObjects;
using FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Repository;
using FluentAssertions;
using Moq;
using Xunit;
namespace FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Infrastructure.Test.Repository
{
public class ProductRepositoryDapperTest
{
private readonly Mock<IDbConnection> _mockDbConnection;
private readonly ProductRepositoryDapper _repository;
public ProductRepositoryDapperTest()
{
_mockDbConnection = new Mock<IDbConnection>();
_repository = new ProductRepositoryDapper(_mockDbConnection.Object);
}
[Fact]
public async Task CreateAsync_Success()
{
// Arrange
var product = new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(5.99m));
_mockDbConnection.SetupDapperAsync(db => db.ExecuteAsync(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(1);
// Act
var result = await _repository.CreateAsync(product);
// Assert
result.Should().NotBeNull();
result.Id.Should().Be(product.Id);
}
[Fact]
public async Task DeleteAsync_Success()
{
// Arrange
var productId = Guid.NewGuid();
_mockDbConnection.SetupDapperAsync(db => db.ExecuteAsync(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(1);
// Act
var result = await _repository.DeleteAsync(productId);
// Assert
result.Should().BeTrue();
}
[Fact]
public async Task GetAll_Success()
{
// Arrange
var products = new ReadOnlyCollection<Product>(new List<Product>
{
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(5.99m)),
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Fries", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(2.99m))
});
_mockDbConnection.SetupDapperAsync(db => db.QueryAsync<Product>(It.IsAny<string>(), null, null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(products);
// Act
var result = await _repository.GetAll();
// Assert
result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(products);
}
[Fact]
public async Task FindByCategory_Success()
{
// Arrange
var category = ProductCategory.Food;
var products = new ReadOnlyCollection<Product>(new List<Product>
{
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", category, new Price(5.99m)),
new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Fries", category, new Price(2.99m))
});
_mockDbConnection.SetupDapperAsync(db => db.QueryAsync<Product>(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(products);
// Act
var result = await _repository.FindByCategory(category);
// Assert
result.Should().BeEquivalentTo(products);
}
[Fact]
public async Task UpdateAsync_Success()
{
// Arrange
var product = new Product(Guid.NewGuid(), "Burger", ProductCategory.Food, new Price(6.99m));
_mockDbConnection.SetupDapperAsync(db => db.ExecuteAsync(It.IsAny<string>(), It.IsAny<object>(), null, null, null)).ReturnsAsync(1);
// Act
var result = await _repository.UpdateAsync(product);
// Assert
result.Should().BeTrue();
}
[Fact]
public async Task FindByIdAsync_NotImplemented()
{
// Act & Assert
await Assert.ThrowsAsync<NotImplementedException>(() => _repository.FindByIdAsync(Guid.NewGuid()));
}
}
}This updated code uses SetupDapperAsync for setting up the mock expectations, which should align with your usage of the Mod.Dapper library. Please review and let me know if further adjustments are needed!
src/FIAP.TechChallenge.ByteMeBurger.Api/Controllers/ProductController.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
