types: type safer implementation for sum function (#358)
#359
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
sodiray
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2024
|
Thank you for the PR @jukanntenn 🙏 this is a great improvement |
aleclarson
referenced
this pull request
in radashi-org/radashi
Jun 24, 2024
* types: type safer implementation for `sum` (#358) * fix checks --------- Co-authored-by: jukanntenn <jukanntenn@outlook.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Type safer implementation for
sumfunction using function overload.Checklist
package.jsonhas been bumped (matching semver)yarn buildcommand has been run and to update thecdndirectory/docsdirectory) has been updatedResolves
Resolves #358