Bring back support for redox in the current setup #35
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Redox is now in the unix family, so there was a comflict with cfgs Redox now implements the isatty function in libc
|
published new version to crates.io https://crates.io/crates/atty |
jackpot51
pushed a commit
to redox-os/cookbook
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 12, 2019
Libc: 0.2.61 Atty: softprops/atty#35
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Redox is now in the unix family, so there was a comflict with cfgs
Redox now implements the isatty function in libc