Create pod-providers #16
Conversation
I propose listing a table with the details of POD providers which can be updated by the POD providers themselves. This way users can understand the differences and POD providers can state their availability. Any suggestions on details about POD providers welcome.
|
https://github.com/solid/solid-idp-list/ suggestions on how to make a smooth overlap between this information, if any, welcome. |
|
Maybe we should do this in a structured data format (as in https://github.com/solid/solid-idp-list/ indeed). |
|
Hmmmm, perhaps we should actually have a |
|
Great suggestions, @kjetilk perhaps you could set this up? |
|
Yeah, created an issue for it. I suppose we are working on a POD provider list, that's a (small) project in its own right, and it would probably have a repo of its own when it gets launched. Not sure how we track such project proposals? I propose we find a way to track such projects, then merge and close this issue. Anyway, setting up the Turtle file with metadata can be done before that, it is something we can do post-5.0.0 release. |
|
Would be good to understand what gets it's own repo and why and who they are all linked together #32 |
I propose listing a table with the details of POD providers which can be updated by the POD providers themselves. This way users can understand the differences and POD providers can state their availability. Any suggestions on details about POD providers welcome.