replacing stupid pathlib with path.py which is much more friendlier. #17
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…Sorry about earlier misjudgement
solos
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2014
replacing stupid pathlib with path.py which is much more friendlier.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sorry about earlier misjudgement, but after looking at it for quite sometime, I think that pathlib just sucks and it's hard to get them to change things since they are now part of Python libs, you would have to do all sorts of PeP write up and stuff. Let's just use path.py: https://github.com/jaraco/path.py which is much friendlier and easier to use. Case in point, did you know that pathlib does not do
chdir()?!