Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 6, 2020. It is now read-only.

Better way to find Minimum/Maximum in range facet result #131

Closed
diegobrum opened this issue Jul 20, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Better way to find Minimum/Maximum in range facet result #131

diegobrum opened this issue Jul 20, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@diegobrum
Copy link
Contributor

Because now, is used a presuposition than facet range started in the past

@diegobrum diegobrum added this to the Backlog milestone Jul 20, 2016
@diegobrum diegobrum modified the milestones: 4.4.0, Backlog Sep 14, 2016
@diegobrum diegobrum modified the milestones: 4.1.0, 4.4.0 Nov 10, 2016
diegobrum pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 18, 2016
diegobrum pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 12, 2017
@diegobrum diegobrum mentioned this issue Jan 12, 2017
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jan 28, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant