-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 683
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skip 'route/test_forced_mgmt_route.py' on 'Arista-7050CX3' platform #12896
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Skip 'route/test_forced_mgmt_route.py' on 'Arista-7050CX3' platform #12896
Conversation
…tform 'x86_64-arista_7050cx3_32s' because it supports only 1 management interface
The pre-commit check detected issues in the files touched by this pull request. Detailed pre-commit check results: To run the pre-commit checks locally, you can follow below steps:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Hi @liuh-80 could you help to review? |
@anishb-arista Can you give more detail at which step in the testcase will add secondary mgmt interface? |
A second management interface is being added in this snippet -> https://github.com/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt/blob/master/tests/route/test_forced_mgmt_route.py#L133-L161 |
Description of PR
Summary:
Fixes #120
Type of change
Back port request
Approach
What is the motivation for this PR?
The test
route/test_forced_mgmt_route.py
needs to be skipped on the platformArista-7050
as the platform supports only one management interfaceHow did you do it?
Skipping the test on the platform
Arista-7050
by updating the filetests/common/plugins/conditional_mark/tests_mark_conditions.yaml
How did you verify/test it?
Tested on Arista-7050 platform
Any platform specific information?
Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
Documentation