The significant rewrite of aclorch when adding ACL_TABLE_TYPE
configuration caused a bug that prevents configuration of any
DTel rules. This is due to use of an incorrect set of enum
mappings while determining which type of AclRule to create.

This commit changes that set of enum mappings.

This also updates the list of actions in the DTel Flow and Drop
watchlist tables so that they match the existing allowed actions
in DTel acl rules.

Signed-off-by: mickeyspiegel <mickey.spiegel@intel.com>

Since the 201911 release, the DTel drop actions have been supported in
the DTel Flow Watchlist as well as the DTel Drop Watchlist. This allows
for simplified operation where there is a single watchlist (DTel Flow
Watchlist) that contains both flow and drop actions.

The significant rewrite of aclorch when adding ACL_TABLE_TYPE
configuration changed the way that the type of AclRule is determined.
The current logic to distinguish between DTelFlow and DTelDrop AclRules
is not correct. A fix to this logic would effectively remove the
distinction between AclRules of type DTelFlow and DTelDrop, allowing
for the larger set of actions supported by DTelFlow in either table.

With this change in behavior, this seems like a good time to remove the
DTel Drop Watchlist, leaving only the DTel Flow Watchlist that supports
the superset of actions for both flow and drop.

Signed-off-by: mickeyspiegel <mickey.spiegel@intel.com>

Note: Leaving definition of TABLE_TYPE_DTEL_FLOW_WATCHLIST unchanged
      for backwards compatibility.

Signed-off-by: mickeyspiegel <mickey.spiegel@intel.com>

…watchlist_tests

[aclorch] Create sonic-swss tests for dtel acl

Signed-off-by: Myron Sosyak <myronx.sosyak@intel.com>

Extend DTEL ACL table

…hlist

…hlist

…hlist