Skip to content

Missing data imputation using the exact conditional likelihood of Deep Latent Variable Models

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

souheib1/Deep-Latent-Variable-Models-exact-conditional-likelihood

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

32 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Deep Latent Variable Models: Exact Likelihood

Missing data imputation using the exact conditional likelihood of DLVM

Some Results :

We're comparing the sampling methods to fill in missing parts of images by looking at the original images alongside versions where some fraction of pixels have been randomly changed.

  1. For MNIST dataset:

comparison_40_random comparison_50_half_top

  1. For OMNIGLOT dataset:

comparison_50_random

Here we show some results about the imputation performance for different percentages of missing data.

F1evolution-Top Finally, we challenge the model by different initializations of the missing parts and we explore the the imputation performance.

Noise_comparaison Initialization

References

@misc{mattei2018leveraging,
      title={Leveraging the Exact Likelihood of Deep Latent Variable Models}, 
      author={Pierre-Alexandre Mattei and Jes Frellsen},
      year={2018},
      eprint={1802.04826},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={stat.ML}
}

@misc{kingma2022autoencoding,
      title={Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes}, 
      author={Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling},
      year={2022},
      eprint={1312.6114},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={stat.ML}
}

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages