-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
configure autocomplete provider based on cody LLM settings in site config #1035
Merged
taras-yemets
merged 13 commits into
main
from
taras-yemets/configure-autocomplete-provider-based-on-site-config
Sep 15, 2023
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
463fd3b
initial commit
taras-yemets 7510a2f
wip: handle providers from VSCode and site configs separately
taras-yemets cea4824
wip
taras-yemets 5d8f8ec
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into taras-yemets/configur…
taras-yemets 08dff29
fix types
taras-yemets 1088f20
add test
taras-yemets a16c760
request LLM provider field separatly for backwards compat
taras-yemets a5af6d1
add test case
taras-yemets 3777fb2
Merge branch 'main' into taras-yemets/configure-autocomplete-provider…
taras-yemets 0157089
fix test
taras-yemets c26b95d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into taras-yemets/configur…
taras-yemets 2f160ea
do not log azure deployment name
taras-yemets 258f153
fix azure openai model name condition and test
taras-yemets File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume this doesn't cause issues if the provider field does not exist?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great catch! How did I miss that?! Thank you, @chwarwick!
Addressed in a16c760
Honestly, I don't like the implementation. Do you know of a more robust way of getting a potentially non-existing field?
cc: @philipp-spiess