Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue: Gitserver migration to Rendezvous hashing #32311

Closed
33 of 34 tasks
asdine opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
33 of 34 tasks

Tracking issue: Gitserver migration to Rendezvous hashing #32311

asdine opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@asdine
Copy link
Contributor

asdine commented Mar 8, 2022

Plan

This is the tracking issue for RFC 595.

Tracked issues

@unassigned: 31.50d

Completed: 31.50d

@asdine: 5.00d

Completed: 5.00d

@sashaostrikov: 3.00d

Completed: 3.00d

@vrto: 4.00d

Completed: 4.00d

Legend

  • 👩 Customer issue
  • 🐛 Bug
  • 🧶 Technical debt
  • 🎩 Quality of life
  • 🛠️ Roadmap
  • 🕵️ Spike
  • 🔒 Security issue
  • 🙆 Stretch goal
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2022

Heads up @jplahn @dan-mckean - the "team/repo-management" label was applied to this issue.

@dan-mckean
Copy link
Contributor

Suggested weekly summary headings:

  • Progress since last update
  • Overall progress towards goal/completion
  • Any blockers/learnings/changes to the plan since last update

@asdine
Copy link
Contributor Author

asdine commented Mar 14, 2022

Last week

We started the ground work:

This week

We will work in parallel:

Progress and blockers

The work has just started last week but everything went smoothly.
The team however is not at 100% capacity.

@asdine
Copy link
Contributor Author

asdine commented Mar 21, 2022

Last week

This week

@asdine
Copy link
Contributor Author

asdine commented Mar 28, 2022

Last week

This week

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants