WIP: Fix "webui" installation with poise_archive #358
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Current coverage is 52.79% (diff: 18.18%)
|
|
I am cool with deprecating the provider and bumping the major version in doing so. |
|
Yes, it sounds good. |
|
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Work in progress: I try to make unit test passing, but seems like they are still failing.
Any suggestions are welcome.
@johnbellone @Ginja What do you think - is it still reasonable to support
:webuiprovider forconsul_installationresource if there is a builtin webui in Consul 0.6.1+ ?FYI: the current implementation of
:webuiprovider is also incompatible with Windows.