Proposal for Expanding Robust Toolbox Modularity #152
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
Design
|
Recreating this because git decided to nuke #143. Webedit is pain, even just for editing docs. |
Jezithyr
added
the
Engine
Jezithyr
added
the
Infrastructure
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft PR for my proposal for making Robust Toolbox more modular.
The concept for this is similar to how unreal engine handles plugins:
docs.unrealengine.com/5.3/en-US/plugins-in-unreal-engine
With elements of unity's package manager and held together with duct-type by Ike's GameHub proposal #133
This is a draft PR, it is not really ready for discussion yet, but feel free to discuss it a bit if you think you have some ideas.
Also, I'm not super sold on Community Modules, they feel like they are effectively just content assemblies.