Regression test for JP-3604

[nden]

Related to JP-3604

This PR adds a regression test to verify the solution for the failure in JP-3604

Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• All comments are resolved
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly
  regression tests: https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1433/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.93%. Comparing base (781e0e0) to head (1892452).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 1892452 differs from pull request most recent head f77aa76. Consider uploading reports for the commit f77aa76 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8477   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.93%   57.93%           
=======================================
  Files         387      387           
  Lines       38839    38852   +13     
=======================================
+ Hits        22502    22510    +8     
- Misses      16337    16342    +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hbushouse]

Regression test failures are unrelated.

[mcara]

I was thinking of having a lightweight unit test instead of a regression test but got delayed by the spherical_geometry issues but since this is already done - it's perfectly fine.

[nden]

Seems uncontroversial, merging.