You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1. Select Global Lepidoptera Index project
2. Create and download COLDP exportfor OTU Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758
3. In Name.csv, "Barsine rhodophila Walker, 1864" is correctly shown as the basionym for"Stigmatophora (Stigmatophora) rhodophila (Walker, 1864)", but there is no recordin Synonym.csv between these two names (whereas other basionyms are shown as synonyms).
ID basionymID scientificName authorship rank uninomial genus infragenericEpithet specificEpithet infraspecificEpithet referenceID publishedInPage publishedInYear original code status link remarks
60591 60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9 Stigmatophora (Stigmatophora) rhodophila (Walker, 1864) species Stigmatophora Stigmatophora rhodophila 1864 false ICZN http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NOMEN_0000224 40015.00|ORIGINAL GENUS UNDETERMINED|Valid name|Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011|Q:\Noctuoidea\Arctiidae\Lithosiinae\Drawer 9A|FC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg|BC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg
60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9 60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9 Barsine rhodophila Walker, 1864 species Barsine rhodophila 1864 true ICZN 40015.00|ORIGINAL GENUS UNDETERMINED|Valid name|Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011|Q:\Noctuoidea\Arctiidae\Lithosiinae\Drawer 9A|FC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg|BC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg
The corresponding record in Taxon.csv is as follows:
ID parentID nameID namePhrase provisional accordingToID scrutinizer scrutinizerID scrutinizerDate referenceID extinct temporalRangeStart temporalRangeEnd environment link remarks
452785 792163 60591
The only record in Synonym.csv for taxon 452785 is:
taxonID nameID status remarks referenceID
452785 899507
It's unclear to me why "Stigmatophora rhodophila (Walker, 1864)" is shown as its own basionym, since this is just another combination based on Barsine rhodophila.
Expected behavior
I would have expected an extra record in Synonym.csv:
taxonID nameID status remarks referenceID
452785 60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9
Additional Screenshots
No response
Environment
Production
Sandbox Used
No response
Version
No response
Browser Used
Vivaldi 6.1.3035.111 (Stable channel) (64-bit)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Steps to reproduce the bug
Screenshot
Here is the relevant set of rows from Name.csv in https://sfg.taxonworks.org/downloads/658:
ID basionymID scientificName authorship rank uninomial genus infragenericEpithet specificEpithet infraspecificEpithet referenceID publishedInPage publishedInYear original code status link remarks
60591 60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9 Stigmatophora (Stigmatophora) rhodophila (Walker, 1864) species Stigmatophora Stigmatophora rhodophila 1864 false ICZN http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NOMEN_0000224 40015.00|ORIGINAL GENUS UNDETERMINED|Valid name|Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011|Q:\Noctuoidea\Arctiidae\Lithosiinae\Drawer 9A|FC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg|BC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg
60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9 60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9 Barsine rhodophila Walker, 1864 species Barsine rhodophila 1864 true ICZN 40015.00|ORIGINAL GENUS UNDETERMINED|Valid name|Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011|Q:\Noctuoidea\Arctiidae\Lithosiinae\Drawer 9A|FC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg|BC-Noctuoidea-Arctiidae-Lithosiinae-9A-010011.jpg
899507 899507 Stigmatophora rhodophila (Walker, 1864) Stigmatophora rhodophila false
The corresponding record in Taxon.csv is as follows:
ID parentID nameID namePhrase provisional accordingToID scrutinizer scrutinizerID scrutinizerDate referenceID extinct temporalRangeStart temporalRangeEnd environment link remarks
452785 792163 60591
The only record in Synonym.csv for taxon 452785 is:
taxonID nameID status remarks referenceID
452785 899507
It's unclear to me why "Stigmatophora rhodophila (Walker, 1864)" is shown as its own basionym, since this is just another combination based on Barsine rhodophila.
Expected behavior
I would have expected an extra record in Synonym.csv:
taxonID nameID status remarks referenceID
452785 60591-1a9c61ff06d4beb2d224632db16c82f9
Additional Screenshots
No response
Environment
Production
Sandbox Used
No response
Version
No response
Browser Used
Vivaldi 6.1.3035.111 (Stable channel) (64-bit)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: