Allow having tree stats use direct rank names (and climb tree)

[realVinayak]

Allows defining a query like 'geography.Country'. Looks for name in the {TREE}treedefitem table.

The previous code allowed just to modify the start values in the last query field, but these changes allow them to be generic.

TO TEST:

1. Go to stats. All the previous versions of stats should still work - the query would be different in the query builder. New ranks will be visible in the add stats dialog (all ranks above Earth / Life are shown).
2. The following query should be present (if rank is continent):
   

Change 2:
Removes distinct from locality stat

[realVinayak]

The query that fetches ranks is done only one time. Since tree ranks are fetched outside of stats already, those could also be used instead of this.

But stats like type status utilizes this too (it fetches distinct type status) so I thought it would be simple enough to just have the taxa ones utilize this in the stats spec.

Alternatively, won't be hard to use the tree tank promise outside of stats here instead of fetching them again

[maxpatiiuk]

I might have missed the context behind some of the changes you did as I am not familiar with the code much (and you created a beast with the stats page), but looking good, and I like some of the refactoring you did

[melton-jason]

It would take me too long to fully understand how Statistics works to fully consider these changes, but from what I am gathering from this little section, the changes seem fine.

[bronwyncombs]

Geog rank stats appeared in the choose stats dialog to be added to a new category. The queries for each rank appear correct. Upon clicking a stat on herb_rbge_9_3_23, the query results were returned promptly, but count was slightly delayed.
Geo represented:

Localities without Distinct:

Also tested on fwri

[grantfitzsimmons]

@realVinayak Seems there are some merge conflicts

[realVinayak]

Also need to test performance on AWS

[realVinayak]

Can this be tested another time by a ux-reviewer before merge? @specify/ux-testing

[pashiav]

Looks good!

[specifysoftware]

This pull request has been mentioned on Specify Community Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.specifysoftware.org/t/specify-7-9-2-release-announcement/1452/1