Make expect the default instead of EXP_expect

[orta]

I've started using Expecta as a dynamic framework. I came upon a pretty serious issue that I have to have silly looking matchers as frameworks don't seem to allow app-level #definesto make changes to external codebases. e.g.

  #define EXP_SHORTHAND
  @import Specta;
  @import Expecta;

Will ignore the EXP_SHORTHAND declaration, and I can only use EXP_expect(x).to.equal(y). It probably made sense to do the EXP_expect to avoid naming collisions. But does anyone really not use it? The whole point is to have readable tests, and so everyone just has to add another line of code.

[orta]

Quick does this: https://github.com/quick/quick#using-quick-in-objective-c-the-optional-shorthand-syntax

[robb]

I'd be all for flipping the default, but semver theoretically requires a major release for that, right?

[orta]

IMO, yes, but given that it's pre 0, a patch may be fine?

[robb]

Oh, right. 👍 from me then

[ashfurrow]

Me, too. Just got caught by the same issue. @orta your solution was just using EXP_expect()?

[orta]

yes

[orta]

holding off on structural changes until #128 is merged

[tonyarnold]

I've actually done this as part of the work for #128, so feel free to close this out in favour of that PR.

[orta]