Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add reference instructions into object description units doc #338

Closed
shimizukawa opened this issue Jan 2, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

Add reference instructions into object description units doc #338

shimizukawa opened this issue Jan 2, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@shimizukawa
Copy link
Member

It will help a lot if unit descriptions contain information how to reference them. For example, function definition at http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/desc.html#dir-function could include a reference to http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/inline.html#role-func.


@shimizukawa
Copy link
Member Author

From Georg Brandl on 2010-02-27 22:00:13+00:00

That's a very good point. I'll have to restructure that documentation anyway in the domains branch, so it will be fine in 1.0.

@shimizukawa
Copy link
Member Author

From Georg Brandl on 2010-05-30 09:57:56+00:00

Should be much better now in tip, see http://sphinx.pocoo.org/latest/domains.html.

@shimizukawa
Copy link
Member Author

From Georg Brandl on 2011-09-22 10:14:40+00:00

Removing milestone: 1.0 (automated comment)

@shimizukawa
Copy link
Member Author

From Georg Brandl on 2013-03-31 13:57:20+00:00

Removing version: 0.6.4 (automated comment)

@skidzo
Copy link

skidzo commented Oct 12, 2017

http://sphinx.pocoo.org/markup/desc.html
this link is broken, it is totally unclear what i should use to document the returned value, rtype, returns, or return???

@tk0miya
Copy link
Member

tk0miya commented Oct 12, 2017

This is closed 4 years ago. This is issue tracker. Please post your questions to sphinx-users forum.

BTW, both return and returns are same meaning. so either is okay. But rtype is used to indicate type of return value. so it is not better to use for description.

@skidzo
Copy link

skidzo commented Oct 13, 2017

Thanks :-)

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 23, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants