Better isolate the SCT conda env by using -p
instead of -n
during creation
#3989
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Previously, when
-n
was used, there was a risk of thevenv_sct
conda environment being created in the global$ENVS_DIRS
directory, rather than the expected$SCT_DIR/python/envs/venv_sct
. This is because-n
is supposed to be a relative name within the global conda envs dir. This global envs dir can be set by users using a.condarc
file. But, SCT would prefer to ignore this global dir, and always create its env in$SCT_DIR
.So instead, we use
-p
, which specifies an absolute path, rather than a relative one. This means it is unaffected by the presence ofenvs_dirs
in a.condarc
file.Further rationale is provided in #3982 (comment).
Linked issues
Fixes #3982.