Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with team balancing favoring Ts #196

Closed
alexrock88 opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Issue with team balancing favoring Ts #196

alexrock88 opened this issue May 17, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@alexrock88
Copy link

Hello, this will probably be a simple fix or something I did wrong, but while running your code (which aside from this has been perfect btw) I have been having an issue with the game favoring Ts (say 4Ts vs 3CTs) and my players are starting to get pretty annoyed. I am rather new coding so I haven't been able to locate what the issue may be at this point but was hoping to get a little help if that is ok.

Thank you!

@RavageCS
Copy link
Contributor

@lazhoroni
Copy link

While cvar is 0.425, it is 4 T - 6 CT. Cvar will do 5 T - 5 CT will do?
I did 0.499. This time it was 4 people - 4 T - 4 CT. I want 3 T - 5 T to be 8 people.

@splewis
Copy link
Owner

splewis commented May 22, 2019

There's 2 cvars:
sm_retakes_ratio_constant
sm_retakes_maxplayers

You can set them to whatever you want in cfg/sourcemod/retakes/retakes.cfg.

If your problem is a bug with those (e.g. more than sm_retakes_maxplayers players can connect, or players are bypassing the ratio cvar somehow), then steps to reproduce will be needed.

@borzaka
Copy link
Contributor

borzaka commented Oct 9, 2019

You can't have different sm_retakes_ratio_constant setting based on how many players are in the game. You can, but you have to manually change based on the player count on the server.

I would say 0.45 is a good value;

  • 8 players: 4v4
  • 10 player: 5v5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants