Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark new Spring extensions as @Beta #890

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2018

Conversation

szpak
Copy link
Member

@szpak szpak commented Sep 2, 2018

Just in a case there will be needed to change it in a not backward
compatible way.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #890 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #890   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.03%   75.03%           
  Complexity     3426     3426           
=========================================
  Files           368      368           
  Lines         10552    10552           
  Branches       1333     1333           
=========================================
  Hits           7918     7918           
  Misses         2167     2167           
  Partials        467      467

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 47201d8...2f5af59. Read the comment docs.

@leonard84
Copy link
Member

@szpak you've missed some new extensions, see release notes ;)

@szpak
Copy link
Member Author

szpak commented Sep 7, 2018

Hmm, I focused on Spring related extensions which I was testing. Nonetheless, I might missed something (however, some of them, such as @AutoAttach or @Retry already are marked as "beta").

@leonard84
Copy link
Member

leonard84 commented Sep 7, 2018

@UnwrapAopProxy for example @ScanScopedBeans

Just in a case there will be needed to change it in a not backward
compatible way.
@szpak
Copy link
Member Author

szpak commented Sep 7, 2018

Fixed.

@leonard84 leonard84 merged commit 8478419 into spockframework:master Sep 9, 2018
MartyIX referenced this pull request in MartyIX/spock Oct 14, 2018
Just in a case there will be needed to change it in a not backward
compatible way.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants