New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
False negative for RC_REF_COMPARISON #2297
Comments
Thanks for opening your first issue here! 😃 |
Apologies - I have found that this can be picked up by an undocumented configuration option.
It would be good if the documentation could be improved to include this information. Happy to help if this is something I can do. |
Hello All, I’ll be happy to pick it up and make corresponding changes in documentation |
…in RC_REF_COMPARISON description (#2537) * Not able to detect SE_NO_SERIALVERSIONID bug - added unit test * Not able to detect SE_NO_SERIALVERSIONID bug - added unit test- change package and add bug type * Not able to detect SE_NO_SERIALVERSIONID bug - added unit test- removed excessive function * A false negative about the rule IL_INFINITE_LOOP #2331 - added unit test * Issue-2331 added missing space * Issue-2297 False negative for RC REF COMPARISON - updated bug description * Issue-2297 False negative for RC REF COMPARISON - add changed log record * Issue-2297 False negative for RC REF COMPARISON - corrected typo * Issue-2297 False negative for RC REF COMPARISON - escaped tags --------- Co-authored-by: yuliya.sokh@gmail.com <21014151y>
Closing as a documentation issue resolved now with #2537 |
I'm not sure if it is the intention of the RC_REF_COMPARISON bug detector to pick up all cases of reference comparison but the following very simple examples are not caught.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: