Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polish note about handling of caches that are created on-the-fly #19491

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

izeye
Copy link
Contributor

@izeye izeye commented Dec 31, 2019

This PR polishes doc a bit.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Dec 31, 2019
Copy link
Member

@snicoll snicoll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @izeye. I am not a native speaker but the proposed changes do not read as I intended them. I've added a comment.

@@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ The following cache libraries are supported:
Metrics are tagged by the name of the cache and by the name of the `CacheManager` that is derived from the bean name.

NOTE: Only caches that are configured on startup are bound to the registry.
For caches not defined in the cache’s configuration, that is caches created on-the-fly or programmatically after the startup phase, an explicit registration is required.
For caches not defined in the cache’s configuration, that are created on-the-fly or programmatically after the startup phase, an explicit registration is required.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really meant "that is" as "i.e.". Perhaps there's a missing comma somewhere?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@snicoll I'm not an English native speaker, either 😅 I just thought that the "that" clause was meant to be for the "caches" as "that is caches" sounded unusual to me. I might be wrong here.

Copy link
Member

@snicoll snicoll Dec 31, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK. I am not sure either :) Would you be happy with

For caches not defined in the cache’s configuration, e.g. caches created on-the-fly or programmatically after the startup phase, ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@snicoll Sounds better to me 😄

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sweet, would you be willing to update your proposal with that please?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@snicoll Sure. I've done that in 44156e8.

@snicoll snicoll added the status: waiting-for-feedback We need additional information before we can continue label Dec 31, 2019
snicoll pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2019
@snicoll snicoll closed this in 9dd3912 Dec 31, 2019
@snicoll snicoll self-assigned this Dec 31, 2019
@snicoll snicoll added type: documentation A documentation update and removed status: waiting-for-feedback We need additional information before we can continue status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged labels Dec 31, 2019
@snicoll snicoll added this to the 2.1.12 milestone Dec 31, 2019
@izeye izeye deleted the patch-55 branch December 31, 2019 09:11
@wilkinsona wilkinsona changed the title Polish doc Polish note about handling of caches that are create on-the-fly Jan 14, 2020
@wilkinsona wilkinsona changed the title Polish note about handling of caches that are create on-the-fly Polish note about handling of caches that are created on-the-fly Jan 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: documentation A documentation update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants