New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add reactive support #397
Comments
I've been doing a little bit of a prototyping and having a proper reactive support means that we need to change some api's quite a bit. There's going to be breaking changes so we need to do these in a new major version. |
- Switch to use a simple port check instead of trying to actually connect via mongo client. - Relates spring-projects#397
- Switch to use a simple port check instead of trying to actually connect via mongo client. - Relates #397
You added reactive action support. Will you add reactive guard support ? |
@burakhelvaci things are very much in-progress right now, but what do you mean by reactive guard? |
Right, if you meant |
- Now defining parallel region execution policy as TaskExecutor won't work anymore. - Relates spring-projects#397
Moving this epic into |
Any news for 3.0.0 release with Flux support? |
Hi All, First of all great work. Any news when release 3.0.0 will be ready ? |
We are looking forward to use this release, any news when 3.0.0 will be available? |
There's some documentation issue to do(which would not delay a release imho) but being honest I haven't received that much feedback about reactive features. I'm basically ready to fire a release any time. |
Thank you for your response. We were trying to call a Spring Reactive Webflux endpoint in the Spring State machine, and we were not able to make the async call as they were blocking the thread. We are interested in using this release so that we can use non-blocking threads. |
@jvalkeal , any information on when spring statemachine will provide support for Reactive stack? |
Closing this as final blocking issues got fixed. There's going to be RC2, and then release. |
This is a master ticket tracking reactive implementation for upcoming 3.x series. This ticket will have many sub-issues.
Main purpose of reactive support is:
TaskExecutor
if favour of getting better run-to-completion model with single-thread execution based on reactor.Epic issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: